I'll Take Manhattan

Like all good cocktails, the Manhattan has a je ne sais quoi, an insouciance, a devil-may-care attitude about it. (It really was a great pick as the Mad Men cocktail.) It is also infinitely variable.

The traditional recipe is:

1 oz Rye or Canadian
2 oz sweet red vermouth
a couple of dashes of Angostura
garnish with a maraschino cherry.

Alas the maraschino cherry in America, outside of NYC and Joisey is not the animal of the hinterland. I therefore avoid it, unless I can get the real Italian maraschino, which is more flavourful, less sweet and has a poignant bitter finish.

I also tend to make mine with closer to the whiskey lover version 1:1 whisky to vermouth.

Note that Alberta Premium is a pure, 100 per cent rye. No barley, no corn, no wheat, no artificial additives of any sort. And if you’re my kind of drinker, you’ll use the 30 year old to make the drink.

There’s nothing like a real mixed drink made with the best ingredients.

Lately I’m a convert to Stock red vermouth.

Posted on by james | 1 Comment

Spicing it Up

Spiced Rum

I’m told the most popular drink of the moment is Captain Morgan Spiced Rum. I’m not much impressed by this drink – an amber rum sweetened with a lot of vanilla. There are huge numbers of competitors leaping into the market including the Kraken pictured at right. (In the background you can see a new ‘spiced’ bourbon from Jim Bean.)

The Kraken is closer to a rum than Cap Morgan, and will accordingly appeal more to those drinkers. The spicing is ginger, vanilla, nutmeg, cloves, allspice, and a few other things I can’t identify. Maybe a citrus zest.

Almost all of the cocktails using spiced rum are horrifically sweet, usually involving blue curacao, coke or some other pop, and then a sweet juice like pineapple or orange.

If you’re going to go down this route why not make your own spiced rum? There’s nothing easier than infusing a liquor with spices.

Here’s my first kick at the cat.
3/4 bottle of dark rum
1 vanilla bean opened
4 cloves
10 whole black peppercorns
2 slices fresh ginger (1/8 thick and about an inch in diameter)
nutmeg to taste (I used a 1/4 of a nut, unground)
a slice of tangerine peel, white pith scraped off

Add the ingredients to the rum, cap and leave somewhere dark for a few days.

It doesn’t hurt to give the bottle a shake and taste it every couple of days. You may want to remove some ingredients if they seem to be dominating.

IF you really adore Captain Morgan Spiced you’ll want to add one or two more vanilla beans.

By the way you can do stuff like this with vodka and white rum too…

And if you want to try the cocktail I enjoyed with John G. here’s the recipe.

1 shot dark rum (50 mls, or 2 oz)
1/2 shot Kahlua
generous squeeze of lime
4 shots coke

Posted in Cocktails, John Gormley Live, Recipes, Spirits | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Hopping Right Along

For those of you who spend more time drinking and less time wondering about why, hops is the ingredient that gives beer it’s astringent taste. It is also a preservative that keeps beer from going bad.

Prior to hops various things were added, usually sugar (honey for mead, various fruit juices) but also marigold and horehound and other astringent herbs.

Anyway, I was wondering if it were possible the Danes took hops to England in the 11th c. or if maybe the Normans did. So there I was checking out the history of England c. 1066.

Well I got led astray by Ehtelred the Unready – and who wouldn’t? – and found myself reading about the various Kings of England, coming across Knut the Great.

Knut or Cnut was the ruler of Denmark, Scotland, England, Norway and Sweden with a few chunks of northern europe and Ireland thrown in for good measure. Hence his greatness.

Knut passed on, and the Danes convened a council or parliament to choose his successor. In the end they opted for his son, Harthacnut.

I guess they decided Harthacnut was better than none…

[exit stage left, pursued by vegetables...]

Posted in Beer | 1 Comment

Amaretto and Liqueurs

So what’s the best brand of Amaretto?

This is now a tough question. Forty years ago it was a no-brainer, Disaronno Originale. These days the question is a little more complicated.

in general making good liqueurs comes down to the ingredients. The best liqueurs, like Chambord and Disaronno use several tons of fruits and nuts to extract the essence that gives their drinks flavour. This makes them expensive.

Knock-offs will use much less flavouring usually augmented with synthetic taste-alikes to get to a similar, but much cheaper flavor profile. In any number of trendy bars and clubs the knock-off is what is used in the cocktail flavored with the liqueur.

These days though there are any number of small local producers that can get funding to go international, hoping for vast profits etc.
Often these labels were around if you were in the neighbourhood, but otherwise unavailble, rather like tequila used to be in Mexico.

Some of these small labels can be exceptional drinks, and I make a point of drinking them when I travel. Can I get them back home? Are they that much ‘better’? That’s the rub.

The difference between a ‘bad’ drink and ‘I don’t like it’ is whether I’m giving you advice. Anything I don’t like is bad to me. But that’s not to say it is universally unacceptable. Everybody is different and you may well prefer something I dislike.

So far I haven’t found anything that significantly improves on Disaronno, so that’s the one I buy. But if you’ve got a brand that makes your tongue light up please let me know. I’d love to try it.

ps. amaretto and kahlua and a touch of good dark rum is an amazing cocktail.

Posted in Spirits | 2 Comments

Riedel: The Victoria’s Secret of Glassware

Riedel Oregon PN and Eisch Chard

Riedel Oregon PN and Eisch Chard

Modern stemware is the equivalent of a pushup bra. Well nothing wrong with that. Few of us when faced with the bare truth are so disenchanted we turn on Leno instead.

The point of a pushup bra is to accentuate the positive and without a doubt the modern stem does this.

I think Riedel’s insight – to design a bowl for every style of wine – was a stroke of design genius that deserves to be in MOMA. Riedel literally revolutionized the stemware business, (thus becoming the Victoria’s Secret of stemware).

Having said that, you need to pay at least as much attention to how you live, entertain and drink as to the need for the ‘proper’ wine glass. My sister gave us a couple of champagne flutes that look beautiful but I’m a klutz. The stems are so tall I distrust their centre of gravity.

Do you spend your life in fear of the environment poisoning you? Lead was originally added to crystal for clarity. (Lead oxide is white.) It also made glass tougher, lending crystal a rubbery consistency.

Thirty years ago, a scientist with too much time on his hands measured the lead content of his Glen Skunky stored in a crystal decanter. He was horrified to discover lead had leached into his booze.

Although the likelihood of lead dissolving into your wine after less than an hour in the glass is pretty much nil, if you’re one of those folks who worry about this stuff you want to avoid leaded crystal. (Actually you should avoid drinking red wine altogether as it’s loaded with minerals.) Of more interest is that the replacements for lead give the glass different mechanical properties.

Eisch has patented a breathable glass. Mikasa, Orrefors, Boda, and every other traditional crystal maker produce gorgeous looking glasses available in traditional bowls and in knock-offs of the Riedel shapes using various materials including – in some jurisdictions – lead.

I have friends in Australia who only hand-wash the morning after, as did I until I ascended into the Dishwasher Owning class. Nor was washing the only source of trouble. I remember a particular evening a long time ago, when a friend attempted to juggle three Rosenthal snifters. Since then I’ve broken literally dozens of stems.

Schott Zwiesel stems are tougher than most – they’ve replaced lead with titanium and zirconium oxide – and if I were still running my swinging bachelor pad this might be a deal maker.

Dishwashers are less punitive on stems than I am, although we had one dishwasher that ate crystal like a carnie. (We ended up with Mexican stems made from recycled glass.) I find some stems are impossible for me to handwash. Schott Zwiesel in particular has such small openings I can’t get my fingers inside the bowl.

But back to taste and the perfect stem, Riedel insight was to shape the bowl to land the wine on the ‘appropriate’ part of the tongue for the wine in question. They also shorten or lengthen the bowl, choking or opening the chimney to attenuate the bouquet.

But – and this butt is of Sir Mix-A-Lot dimensions – Riedel is designing their bowls to provide specific flavours.

I had an argument with Max Riedel about his bourbon glass and his vintage port glass neither of which provided me with the expected taste spectrum. (He agreed with me about the bourbon – the design parameter was set by Jim Beam – but he politely told me to soak my head and try the port glass again.)

Not only do the glasses provide specific taste profiles, they are designed and most often utilized in particular conditions. What about humidity? Napa, Barossa, and Southern Ontario humidity is about twice that of Saskatoon’s. Bouquet travels a whole lot further in those tasting rooms than in a Sask dining room.

For these reasons I sometimes disagree with the ‘official’ wine glass. Heck, I’ll skip falsies to go with the natural look and drink from a plexi tumbler – the official wine glass of Tuscan trattorias.

If you worry what wine snob friends think of your choice of glass, you probably should stick with Riedel. (And they have another brilliant design the ‘O’ series that has the same bowl shape but no stems easing dishwasher use.)

I like Eisch for big reds, Riedel for whites, and sundry crystal manufacturers for the rest. Our martini glasses are Mikasa and I am willing to drink water in ‘em just for the pleasure of looking at them.

Posted in Spirits, Wine | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment